Awaken The Giant Within is the psychological blueprint you can follow to wake up and start taking control of your life, starting in your mind, spreading through your body and then all the way through your relationships, work and finances until you’re the giant you were always meant to be.
Sometimes I forget. I read the summary of a book like this
and think “Man, I’ve heard a lot of this before.” But that’s because a) I read
a lot of self-help books and b) the market has been flooded with them over the
past 20-30 years. This makes it easy to forget to put each book into
perspective.
Awaken The Giant Within was released in 1991 – the year I
was born. If I imagine someone reading it some 25 years ago, this book can’t
have felt anything other than groundbreaking. The strategies and techniques
Tony Robbins talks about have long become standard practice, but he pioneered
them.
Here are 3 lessons to help you feel more in charge of your
life than ever before:
Associate bad habits with pain and good ones with pleasure.
Change the words you use to transform how you feel and dealwith problems.
Make up your own rules and communicate them to becomehappier.
Ready to wake up your inner giant? Let’s do it!
Lesson 1: Associate bad habits with pain and good ones with
pleasure.
A very simple framework to look at the world is this: All of
our actions are aimed at either avoiding pain or getting pleasure. Going to the
job you don’t like is something you do to avoid the pain of not being able to
pay rent. Listening to your favorite song should lift your mood. And so on.
You can use this framework to successfully break bad habits
and establish good ones. You simply have to pair bad habits with pain and good
habits with pleasure.
For example, if you want to quit eating chocolate, Tony says
you should force yourself to sing a song you hate out loud every time you eat
some. After having to sing a terrible song loudly at a packed restaurant even
once, just because you ordered molten chocolate lava cake for dessert, chances
are you’ll easily avoid the cocoa-packed candy from then on.
Eventually, you’ll have to replace your bad habit with a
new, better, more positive one, in order to fill the void. This is a crucial
part of habit change. A technique called temptation bundling can help you with
it. The creator, Kathy Milkman, loved the Hunger Games audiobooks, but allowed
herself to listen only while working out in the gym. As a result, she worked
out six times a week, just to find out what happens!
Lesson 2: Use different words to end up in a different state
of mind.
If you’ve ever seen Tony Robbins in action, you know he’s a
powerful guy in every sense of the word. He’s tall, big, loud, and has a very
positive aura. Something you might have not picked up on is his vocabulary.
Tony always uses expressive and unusual language to reinforce positive emotions
and play down negative ones.
He calls this transformational vocabulary and says it’s very
important to watch your language, because the way you describe how you
experience the world is a big and defining part of that experience. In the
English language, there are over 3,000 words to describe emotions. Sadly, 66%
of them are for negative emotions – twice as many as for positive ones!
So how can you use words to your advantage?
Reinforce good feelings with powerful words and play down
bad emotions with less intense language.
For example, instead of saying that lying in the sun makes
you feel happy, you could say: “I’m in complete bliss.” And instead of yelling
“This piece of junk is annoying the crap out of me!” at your car that just
broke down, you could say “Well, that’s a bit unfortunate.”
Pro tip: Use unusual words to make yourself laugh at tough
situations. For example say: “I do feel a little irked at this.” when you’re
really frustrated. Just hearing yourself talk out loud using such old-fashioned
words will instantly put you in a better mood.
Lesson 3: Make up your own rules and tell other people about
them to increase your happiness.
“I’m having a long day at work today, but I know I’ll feel
great once I sit down on my couch after I come home.”
Have you ever thought something like this? I’m pretty sure
you have. We all have our own little rules that determine what does and doesn’t
make us happy. However, all too often we make up rules where we give away
control. For example, “I’ll be so happy if my boss tells me I did a great job
with this presentation.” is not a good rule to have, because you hand over your
happiness to your boss – whom you can’t control.
So first, make up better rules. “I’ll be happy if I spend at
least one hour of focused work on this event plan.” is a lot better than the
rule above, because this is something you can influence.
Secondly, communicate your rules as much as you can, because
you can’t possibly expect other people to have the same rules as you do. When
you think your best friend is not a good friend, because she only calls you
once a month, then that’s just your rule about thinking best friends call each
other every few days. Tell her that that’s what you believe and she’ll tell you
her rule, which then lets the two of you find a better solution that works for
both of you.
My personal take-aways
Tony Robbins is always worth spending some time with, no matter in what format. Even 25 years later, this book still has a massive capacity to inspire you and give you actionable steps to start changing your life for the better, today. I especially loved using better language, because it’s an easy win.
Awaken
The Giant Within by Anthony Robbins
Print
| Kindle | Audiobook
Awaken
The Giant Within Summary
The
Book in Three Sentences
“Any
time you sincerely want to make a change, the first thing you must do is to
raise your standards and believe you can meet them”.
“We
must change our belief system and develop a sense of certainty that we can and
will meet the new standards before we actually do”.
“It’s
not what we do once in a while that shapes our lives, but what we do
consistently”.
The
Five Big Ideas
“The
three decisions that control your destiny are: 1. Your decisions about what to
focus on. 2. Your decisions about what things mean to you. 3. Your decisions
about what to do to create the results you desire”.
“By
changing any one of these five elements—whether it’s a core belief or rule, a
value, a reference, a question, or an emotional state—you can immediately
produce a powerful and measurable change in your life”.
“Everything
you and I do, we do either out of our need to avoid pain or our desire to gain
pleasure”.
“It’s
not the events of our lives that shape us, but our beliefs as to what those
events mean”.
“Focus
on where you want to go, not on what you fear”.
Free
Download: Download a free PDF version of this book summary. (Includes exercises
not included in the post.)
Awaken
The Giant Within Summary
“Any
time you sincerely want to make a change, the first thing you must do is to
raise your standards and believe you can meet them”.
“We must
change our belief system and develop a sense of certainty that we can and will
meet the new standards before we actually do”.
“You
see, in life, lots of people know what to do, but few people actually do what
they know”.
“In
essence, if we want to direct our lives, we must take control of our consistent
actions. It’s not what we do once in a while that shapes our lives, but what we
do consistently”.
“It’s
in your moments of decision that your destiny is shaped”.
“Not
only do you have to decide what results you are committed to, but also the kind
of person that you’re committed to becoming”.
“If
you don’t set a baseline standard for what you’ll accept in your life, you’ll
find it’s easy to slip into behaviors and attitudes or a quality of life that’s
far below what you deserve”.
“If
you truly decide to, you can do almost anything”.
“Making
a true decision means committing to achieving a result, and then cutting
yourself off from any other possibility”.
“The
three decisions that control your destiny are: 1. Your decisions about what to
focus on. 2. Your decisions about what things mean to you. 3. Your decisions
about what to do to create the results you desire”.
“It’s
likely that whatever challenges you have in your life currently could have been
avoided by some better decisions upstream”.
“Your
Master System is comprised of five components: 1) your core beliefs and
unconscious rules, 2) your life values, 3) your references, 4) the habitual
questions that you ask yourself, and 5) the emotional states you experience in
each moment”.
“By
changing any one of these five elements—whether it’s a core belief or rule, a
value, a reference, a question, or an emotional state—you can immediately
produce a powerful and measurable change in your life”.
“Remember:
Success truly is the result of good judgment. Good judgment is the result of
experience, and experience is often the result of bad judgment!”
“In
order to succeed, you must have a long-term focus”.
“God’s
delays are not God’s denials”.
“Often,
what seems impossible in the short term becomes very possible in the long term
if you persist”.
“Remember
the true power of making decisions”.
“Realize
that the hardest step in achieving anything is making a true commitment—a true
decision”.
“A
critical rule I’ve made for myself is never to leave the scene of a decision
without first taking a specific action toward its realization”.
“Make
decisions often and learn from them”.
“Ask
yourself, ‘What’s good about this? What can I learn from this?’”
“Stay
committed to your decisions, but stay flexible in your approach”.
“Know
that it’s your decisions, and not your conditions, that determine your
destiny”.
“Everything
you and I do, we do either out of our need to avoid pain or our desire to gain
pleasure”.
“For
most people, the fear of loss is much greater than the desire for gain”.
“Why
is it that people can experience pain yet fail to change? They haven’t
experienced enough pain yet; they haven’t hit what I call emotional threshold”.
“If
we link massive pain to any behavior or emotional pattern, we will avoid
indulging in it at all costs”.
“It’s
our neuro-associations— the associations we’ve established in our nervous
systems—that determine what we’ll do”.
“Any
time we’re in an intense emotional state, when we’re feeling strong sensations
of pain or pleasure, anything unique that occurs consistently will become
neurologically linked”.
“Most
of us base our decisions about what to do on what’s going to create pain or
pleasure in the short term instead of the long term”.
“It’s
not actual pain that drives us, but our fear that something will lead to pain.
And it’s not actual pleasure that drives us, but our belief—our sense of
certainty—that somehow taking a certain action will lead to pleasure”.
“We’re
not driven by the reality, but by our perception of reality”.
“Remember,
anything you want that’s valuable requires that you break through some
short-term pain in order to gain long-term pleasure”.
“It’s
not the events of our lives that shape us, but our beliefs as to what those
events mean”.
“It’s
never the environment; it’s never the events of our lives, but the meaning we
attach to the events—how we interpret them—that shapes who we are today and who
we’ll become tomorrow”.
“What
are our beliefs designed for? They’re the guiding force to tell us what will
lead to pain and what will lead to pleasure”.
“Whenever
something happens in your life, your brain asks two questions: 1) Will this
mean pain or pleasure? 2) What must I do now to avoid pain and/or gain
pleasure?”
“The
challenge is threefold: 1) most of us do not consciously decide what we’re
going to believe; 2) often our beliefs are based on misinterpretation of past
experiences; and 3) once we adopt a belief, we forget it’s merely an
interpretation”.
“Global
beliefs are the giant beliefs we have about everything in our lives: beliefs
about our identities, people, work, time, money, and life itself, for that
matter”.
“These
giant generalizations are often phrased as is/am/are: ‘Life is…’ ‘I am…’
‘People are …’.”
“If
you can think of an idea as being like a tabletop with no legs, you’ll have a
fair representation of why an idea doesn’t feel as certain as a belief. Without
any legs, that tabletop won’t even stand up by itself. Belief, on the other
hand, has legs. If you really believe, ‘I’m sexy’, how do you know you’re sexy?
Isn’t it true that you have some references to support the idea—some
experiences in life to back it up? Those are the legs that make your tabletop
solid, that make your belief certain”.
“Sometimes
we gather references through information we get from other people, or from
books, tapes, movies, and so on. And sometimes we form references based solely
on our imagination”.
“The
strongest and most solid legs are formed by personal experiences that we have a
lot of emotion attached to because they were painful or pleasurable
experiences”.
“If
you develop the absolute sense of certainty that powerful beliefs provide, then
you can get yourself to accomplish virtually anything, including those things
that other people are certain are impossible”.
“The
most effective way is to get your brain to associate massive pain to the old
belief”.
“New
experiences trigger change only if they cause us to question our beliefs.
Remember, whenever we believe something, we no longer question it in any way”.
“If
you question anything enough, eventually you’ll begin to doubt it”.
“I’ve
classified beliefs into three categories: opinions, beliefs, and convictions”.
“An
opinion is something we feel relatively certain about, but the certainty is
only temporary because it can be changed easily”.
“A
belief, on the other hand, is formed when we begin to develop a much larger
base of reference legs, and especially reference legs about which we have
strong emotion”.
“A
conviction, however, eclipses a belief, primarily because of the emotional
intensity a person links to an idea. A person holding a conviction does not
only feel certain, but gets angry if their conviction is even questioned. A
person with a conviction is unwilling to ever question their references, even
for a moment; they are totally resistant to new input, often to the point of
obsession”.
“Someone
with a conviction is so passionate about their belief that they’re even willing
to risk rejection or make a fool of themselves for the sake of their conviction”.
“So
how can you create a conviction? 1) Start with the basic belief. 2) Reinforce
your belief by adding new and more powerful references. 3) Then find a
triggering event, or else create one of your own. Associate yourself fully by
asking, ‘What will it cost me if I don’t?’ Ask questions that create emotional
intensity for you. 4) Finally, take action. Each action you take strengthens
your commitment and raises the level of your emotional intensity and
conviction”.
“The
way to expand our lives is to model the lives of those people who are already
succeeding. It’s just a matter of asking questions: ‘What do you believe makes
you different? What are the beliefs you have that separate you from others?’”
“At
the end of each day I ask myself these questions: What have I learned today?
What did I contribute or improve? What did I enjoy?”
“NAC
is a step-by-step process that can condition your nervous system to associate
pleasure to those things you want to continuously move toward and pain to those
things you need to avoid in order to succeed consistently in your life without
constant effort or willpower”.
“We
all want to change either 1) how we feel about things or 2) our behaviors”.
“There
are three specific beliefs about responsibility that a person must have if
they’re going to create long-term change: 1) First, we must believe, ‘Something
must change’—not that it should change, not that it could or ought to, but that
it absolutely must. Second, we must not only believe that things must change,
but we must believe, ‘I must change it’. Third, we have to believe, ‘I can
change it’.”
“Each
time we experience a significant amount of pain or pleasure, our brains search
for the cause and record it in our nervous systems to enable us to make better
decisions about what to do in the future”.
“Any
time you experience significant amounts of pain or pleasure, your brain
immediately searches for the cause. It uses the following three criteria. 1.
Your brain looks for something that appears to be unique. 2. Your brain looks
for something that seems to be happening simultaneously. 3. Your brain looks
for consistency”.
“So
often we blame the wrong cause, and thereby close ourselves off from possible
solutions”.
“The
difference between acting badly or brilliantly is not based on your ability,
but on the state of your mind and/or body in any given moment”.
“Emotion
is created by motion”.
“Focus
on where you want to go, not on what you fear”.
“Our
ability to change the way we feel depends upon our ability to change our
submodalities”.
“You’ve
got to be in a determined state in order to succeed”.
“I
began to realize that thinking itself is nothing but the process of asking and
answering questions”.
“Quality
questions create a quality life”.
“A
genuine quality of life comes from consistent, quality questions”.
“Questions
accomplish three specific things: 1. Questions immediately change what we’re
focusing on and therefore how we feel. 2. Questions change what we delete. 3.
Questions change the resources available to us”.
“You
and I can change how we feel in an instant, just by changing our focus”.
“One
of the ways that I’ve discovered to increase the quality of my life is to model
the habitual questions of people I really respect”.
“The
words you habitually choose also affect how you communicate with yourself and
therefore what you experience”.
“People
with an impoverished vocabulary live an impoverished emotional life; people
with rich vocabularies have a multi-hued palette of colors with which to paint
their experience, not only for others, but for themselves as well”.
“Simply
by changing your habitual vocabulary—the words you consistently use to describe
the emotions of your life—you can instantaneously change how you think, how you
feel, and how you live”.
“If
we want to change our lives and shape our destiny, we need to consciously
select the words we’re going to use, and we need to constantly strive to expand
our level of choice”.
“Setting
goals is the first step in turning the invisible into the visible—the
foundation for all success in life”.
“All
goal setting must be immediately followed by both the development of a plan,
and massive and consistent action toward its fulfillment”.
“It’s
not just getting a goal that matters, but the quality of life you experience
along the way”.
“Remember,
our goal is not to ignore the problems of life, but to put ourselves in better
mental and emotional states where we can not only come up with solutions, but
act upon them”.
“We
must remember that all decision-making comes down to values clarification”.
“The
only way for us to have long-term happiness is to live by our highest ideals,
to consistently act in accordance with what we believe our life is truly
about”.
“Many
people know what they want to have, but have no idea of who they want to be”.
“Remember
that your values—whatever they are—are the compass that is guiding you to your
ultimate destiny”.
“Anytime
you have difficulty making an important decision, you can be sure that it’s the
result of being unclear about your values”.
“To
value something means to place importance upon it; anything that you hold dear
can be called a ‘value’.”
“So
often people are too busy pursuing means values that they don’t achieve their
true desire: their ends values”.
“The
hierarchy of your values is controlling the way you make decisions in each
moment”.
“We
must remember, then, that any time we make a decision about what to do, our
brain first evaluates whether that action can possibly lead to either
pleasurable or painful states”.
“Most
of us have created numerous ways to feel bad, and only a few ways to truly feel
good”.
“How
do we know if a rule empowers or disempowers us? There are three primary
criteria: 1. It’s a disempowering rule if it’s impossible to meet. 2. A rule is
disempowering if something that you can’t control determines whether your rule
has been met or not. 3. A rule is disempowering if it gives you only a few ways
to feel good and lots of ways to feel bad”.
“Once
we design our values, we must decide what evidence we need to have before we
give ourselves pleasure. We need to design rules that will move us in the
direction of our values, that will clearly be achievable, using criteria we can
control personally so that we’re ringing the bell instead of waiting for the
outside world to do it”.
“If
you ever feel angry or upset with someone, remember, it’s your rules that are
upsetting you, not their behavior”.
“The
‘must’ and the ‘must never’ rules are threshold rules; the ‘should’ and ‘should
never’ rules are personal standard rules”.
“Design
your rules so that you’re in control, so that the outside world is not what
determines whether you feel good or bad. Set it up so that it’s incredibly easy
for you to feel good, and incredibly hard to feel bad”.
“The
larger the number and greater the quality of our references, the greater our
potential level of choices. A larger number and greater quality of references
enables us to more effectively evaluate what things mean and what we can do”.
“Once
again, it’s not our references, but our interpretations of them, the way we
organize them—that clearly determine our beliefs”.
“The
key is to expand the references that are available within your life.
Consciously seek out experiences that expand your sense of who you are and what
you’re capable of, as well as organize your references in empowering ways”.
“The
way we use our references will determine how we feel, because whether something
is good or bad is all based on what you’re comparing it to”.
“You
are not even limited to your own personal experiences as references. You can
borrow the references of other people”.
“Limited
references create a limited life. If you want to expand your life, you must
expand your references by pursuing ideas and experiences that wouldn’t be a
part of your life if you didn’t consciously seek them out”.
“We
all will act consistently with our views of who we truly are, whether that view
is accurate or not”.
“As
we develop new beliefs about who we are, our behavior will change to support
the new identity”.
“If
you’ve repeatedly attempted to make a particular change in your life, only to
continually fall short, invariably the challenge is that you were trying to
create a behavioral or emotional shift that was inconsistent with your belief
about who you are”.
The
Ultimate Success Formula
Decide
what you want
Take
action
Notice
what’s working or not
Change
your approach until you achieve what you want
Free
Download: Download a free PDF version of this book summary. (Includes exercises
not included in the post.)
Other
Books by Anthony Robbins
Notes
From a Friend
Unlimited
Power: The New Science of Personal Achievement by Anthony Robbins
Recommended
Reading
If
you like Awaken the Giant within, you may also enjoy the following books:
Anything
You Want: 40 Lessons for a New Kind of Entrepreneur by Derek Siver
Secrets
of The Millionaire Mind: Mastering The Inner Game of Wealth by T. Harv Eker
The
Success Principles: How to Get From Where You Are to Where You Want to Be by
Jack Canfield
Are You Fully Charged shows you the three keys to arriving at work and life with a battery that’s brimming with happiness and motivation, which are energy, interactions and meaning, and how to implement them in your day.
Don’t you hate when authors tell you one thing in their
first book and then try to sell you on the complete opposite idea in the next
one? It doesn’t happen too often, but when it does, I always feel gamed, sort
of like they’re just in it for the money.
Tom Rath doesn’t do that. Instead, his books build on one
another. Are You Fully Charged is his most recent one, and it incorporates what
he learned and taught in Eat, Move, Sleep into a practice that goes beyond
health and into happiness.
It is based on three things: meaning, interactions and
energy.
I want to share 3 lessons about these chargers with you
today:
The pursuit of happiness is our biggest roadblock on the way towards it.
Put your phone out of sight when talking to someone.
Try to take 10,000 steps a day.
Lead acid or Lithium ion, it doesn’t matter, by the end of
this article, you’ll know how to wake up fully charged!
Lesson 1: The pursuit of happiness is our biggest roadblock
on the way towards it.
There are many books, movies, and entire cultures built
around the pursuit of happiness. It’s what fuels the American Dream (and life
in most other Western countries), and while there’s a lot of debate around what
it should look like, hardly anyone questions the premise itself:
Is happiness even something that must be pursued?
Well, Tom Rath isn’t “hardly anyone”, so he raises just that
question. He believes thinking that, as long as we spend enough time chasing
it, we’ll eventually find happiness is one of the biggest misconceptions of the
21st century.
You might have already learned that external motivation
ruins internal motivation. But if Tom Rath is right, this means it actively
makes you unhappier, instead of just not increasing your happiness.
He says happiness is simply a by-product of a meaningful
life, which is centered around internal motivation.
I’m in a café right now. Let’s say the waitress can
comfortably serve 50 people a day, then she can make all these interactions
light and positive and find meaning in those. If her boss told her she’d get
twice the money for serving 75 customers, she’d be forced to give less time to
each one, and focus on efficiency, rather than politeness.
She might get the extra money, but that not only won’t make
her happier, she’d also sap the meaning from her interactions and thus end up a
lot unhappier than she was before.
Lesson 2: Hide your phone somewhere out of sight when
talking to someone.
Have you ever seen two people in a restaurant, sitting
opposite each other, each staring at their own smartphone? It’s a nightmare.
The only thing that’s worse is when just one person stares at their phone, and
leaves the other one hanging.
I’ve always tried to avoid using my phone in conversation,
but this I didn’t know about, and it takes it one step further:
A 2014 study found that conversations, where no phone is
visually present, are significantly superior to those, where a phone is on the
table, in someone’s hand, or otherwise in sight.
This is called the iPhone effect, and it implies that even
if people just see a phone while talking to you, they already feel like you’re
not giving them your full attention and can’t be as empathic towards you.
My phone is dead silent, and I usually put it face down on
the table when I’m out with friends, but from now on, I’ll try to completely
put it out of sight – and you should do the same to see your relationships
thrive.
Lesson 3: Make an effort to take 10,000 steps every day,
starting today.
Here’s a crazy fact: You sit more than you sleep. On
average, people sit for 9.3 hours a day, while sleeping only for 7.7. According
to Tom Rath, this is what happens when you sit for extended periods of time:
The nerves in your legs stop working and shut down.
Your calorie burning rate drops to one calorie per minute.
The number of enzymes, which break down fat in your body,
drops by 90%.
Your good cholesterol (HDL, High-Density Lipoprotein) drops
by 10% every hour.
Here’s how to avoid all of this: take 10,000 steps every
day.
It sounds like a lot, but it really isn’t. 10,000 steps
equals roughly 5 miles (or 8 km) a day. According to Tom, walking increases
your energy levels by 150%, and since I started paying more attention to it, I
feel he’s right. Do this to make sure you hit your 10,000 step goal each day:
Design your environment to make you move. For example, when
using your laptop in your office, leave your charger in another room, so you
have to go and get it when you run out of power.
Take detours. When I walk to the café I work in in the
morning, I always go right, instead of left, when I leave my house, to make sure
I do a full circle of the city center before going there. Extending walks
you’re already taking is a lot easier than making up reasons to take more of
them.
Track your steps. Just seeing the number on a regular basis
will make you work harder towards your goal. I guarantee it. This thing will
probably save my life.
My personal take-aways
I love that Tom doesn’t compartmentalize life into certain
buckets, because fixing just one thing about yourself is never the solution.
The only thing I can critique about his work is promoting a fairly specific
diet, instead of telling you to find out what works for you. Other than that,
everything he does is very focused on giving you principles, which you can then
decide how to turn into action for yourself. He shows you the research and what
it means, you do something to make your life better.
I believe that’s the only way self improvement can work,
consider me a fan!
Change your perspective on negotiation and cultivate a mindset of discovery
Open questions can get you the resultyou want and make the other party feel in control
Resolve conflict withoutconfrontation in four simple steps
Show empathy and identify theemotions of others in order to influence them
Don’t just get people to say“yes”—you want them to say “that’s right”
Learn to read the unspoken needs ofthe other party during negotiation, and address their “irrational blind spots”preemptively
Final summary
Now read the book
Key takeaways
What’s it about?
If you often struggle to get what you want out of life, then it
may be time to develop your negotiation skills. This may seem like a strange
suggestion if you have become accustomed to thinking of negotiation in business
terms. However, negotiation is actually the art of learning how to communicate
effectively and get results, which can apply to every part of your life—whether
that is closing a business deal, getting a good price for a new car, or
persuading your children to go to bed on time.
Typically, people perceive negotiation as a kind of sales strategy
that is applied in a logical and mathematical way: if you complete x, y, and z,
then you will achieve your goal. This has changed significantly over the years,
especially for the FBI, who had to revise their approach to negotiations
following grave failures, such as the Downs Hijacking in 1971, which led to a
law suit against the FBI for turning a waiting game into a shoot out.
Now the FBI has become more emotionally engaged with the
psychological tactics and strategies that they use for hostage situations; they
also launched a Critical Incident Resolution Group (CIRG) in 1994. In Never
Split the Difference, their top negotiation tips are
revealed—techniques that have been proven in high-risk situations, but can also
be helpful in everyday life, enabling success in irrational and emotionally
driven situations.
You will discover how to decipher what people want from you, why
they want it, and how to be empathetic in a tactical way that leads toward
achieving your ultimate goal. In simple terms, you will be able to improve the
way you communicate with people so that you can get what you want out of life
in any given situation.
Change your perspective on negotiation and
cultivate a mindset of discovery
The term “negotiation” has a lot of negative association. It may
conjure up a memory of a time when you have been in conflict or felt bullied by
someone into selling your product for less than it is worth—or indeed been
pressured into overspending as a customer. But, while a bad negotiator may well
treat the matter like a battle of intellect, good negotiators will approach
things with curiosity and an open mind.
A good negotiator expects surprises and treats negotiation as
information-gathering. Before you can achieve your end goal and influence the
person you are communicating with, you need to forget any assumptions you may
hold and solely focus on listening to them. This means truly
listening, not just nodding your head and pretending it is going in while you
continue to practice your own argument in your mind. Any potential scenarios
you are imagining should only be considered a possibility.
Negotiations can feel overwhelming because your mind is trying to
process the information gathered into potential difficulties or possible
resolutions while you are still in the middle of a discussion. This makes
active listening quite tricky, no matter how hard you try. It’s also why the
FBI assigns a team of listeners for hostage negotiations, to avoid missing any
nuggets of information that could help them lead hostages to safety.
To discover whether you are in the habit of relying on
assumptions, think back to a moment when you felt you didn’t get the end result
you were after, whether it was in a business meeting or during a disagreement
at home. Be honest with yourself and answer these four questions:
Did you
begin with any assumptions about what the person wanted?
Did you
truly listen and discover anything new about them?
Did you
allow them enough time to explain themselves, or did you rush them?
How much
of the negative emotion felt during this conversation came from the voice
inside your head versus the person in front of you?
In reflection, it is likely that you will now see just how much
your actions during that meeting were influenced by internally formed
assumptions. Quite possibly you didn’t truly listen to the other person because
you had already decided on the outcome before the meeting began.
Learning to take a step back, clear your mind, and truly listen is
the most effective way to become a successful negotiator. By approaching
conversations with a mindset of discovery, you will begin to build trust and
cultivate a safe environment for sharing. This will lead the other party to
reveal key information that could not only inform what you do next, but also
nurture a strong relationship between the two of you—a far more satisfactory
result than what you may have experienced in the past.
Open questions can get you the result you want
and make the other party feel in control
Whether you are dealing with a hostage situation, a family feud,
or closing a business deal, when you start a negotiation, it is natural to
grasp for control so that you can get the result you want. Unfortunately this
often leads to a meaningless and potentially insincere agreement, rather than
wholehearted understanding or a binding contract.
Remember: getting a yes means nothing without the how. When we
hear “yes,” we often ignore any signals that the other party are not trulyonboard,
which can later result in a failure to follow through on the agreement.
However, posing open questions early on can help you to introduce ideas rather
than impose them, allowing your counterpart to consider the best solution and
truly commit to the eventual result. If what you want
becomes their idea, the deal will be a lot easier and more
likely to close.
Let’s explore how open questions can be used in practice. In a
serious situation, such as a kidnapping scenario when the life of a loved one
is being threatened for a large ransom, the open question “How do I know they
are alive?” or “How can I do that when I don’t have that kind of money?” will
buy the FBI time and nurture “forced empathy” with the kidnapper, causing them
to identify with those being ransomed and encouraging them to seek out a
solution to the problem. Alternatively, if you are trying to stop your teenager
running away from home, you could switch “Please don’t leave!” with “What do
you hope to achieve by going?” This will make them consider their reason for
leaving and open up a dialogue so you can get to the bottom of the issue at
hand.
In a business setting, one of the most common mistakes negotiators
make is to arrange a deal that only serves the people in the room—not
accounting for any invisible decision makers behind the scenes. These
individuals often halt progress, meaning that what seemed like a sure thing
between those present in the negotiation never manifests into a signed
contract. To help avoid any blockers along the way, it is a good idea to use
open questions that address the wider business. You could ask “How would this
impact the rest of the business?” or “What can we do to help make this
transition run smoothly for everyone involved?”
A negotiation shouldn’t be approached with a view to overcoming
challenges and defeating your counterpart. A good negotiator will instead focus
on enticing the other party toward a preferred result and will gather
information about the bigger picture, leading to a mutually beneficial
resolution that is agreeable to everyone involved. If you use some
intelligently applied open questions, starting with “how” or “what,” you can
achieve your goal while creating the illusion that they are in control—a
win-win situation.
Resolve conflict without confrontation in four
simple steps
We have all encountered someone in a position of authority
resistant to input; they prefer compliance instead of collaboration, and
nothing you say will ever change their mind. Right? Wrong. In addition to open
questions, there are four key steps used by the FBI for negotiations that can
help you disarm this personality type.
Use a calming tone of voice. Like a late-night radio host, talk smoothly with downward
inflections.
Start with saying sorry. If you say sorry, you appear empathetic and understanding of
their situation.
Use mirroring techniques. Mirroring the other party’s body language or repeating their
words helps make you more relatable and builds rapport.
Pause for at least four seconds after speaking. The passing of time
is the most powerful negotiation tool used in FBI negotiations, so don’t be
afraid to go silent. This will let the other party keep talking, providing you
with more valuable information. Plus, they may end up negotiating against
themselves.
Then, simply repeat the process, and keep using these techniques
until you get the result you are after, while also using open questions.
This technique works in volatile FBI hostage negotiations, but it
can also work with any difficult personalities you need to handle personally,
whether you are dealing with an unreasonable boss or an adolescent child. Let’s
say your boss has asked you to stay late for a non-urgent project. Using a calm
tone of voice, say sorry and repeat (mirror) the request, for example: “Sorry,
you want me to stay late for X project due next month?” Then wait in silence,
and allow them to rethink the request. At this point, they may give you a valid
reason for the request, which will help you to proceed with the negotiation,
understanding where they’re coming from. But more often than not, when the
other party is forced to reconsider what they are asking, it will lead them to
change their mind.
Of course, as the saying goes, it is not what we
say but how we say it. As humans, we subconsciously feel
calmer when someone speaks to us at slower pace, which helps alleviate any
unnecessary anxiety. Your “radio host voice” may be a bit much the entire time,
and there may also be occasion for a more playful tone to create a positive
atmosphere. To understand which tone will work best, consider what the other
party needs: if they seem anxious, then they need your calming voice. If they
seem bored or unmotivated, use your playful voice.
Ultimately, if you follow these steps, you will be creating a
safer environment for you both to talk and think together. This will enable you
to build up trust with the person you are negotiating with as you allow them to
revaluate their own position and open up.
Show empathy and identify the emotions of others
in order to influence them
For many years, the FBI ignored the role of emotion in
negotiation. It was seen as a hindrance; the primary goal was to separate people
from the problem. However, in any high-risk situation that requires an FBI
negotiation, emotion is the problem—rational thought is not on
the agenda.
Now, an experienced FBI negotiator also needs to be emotionally
intelligent, much like a trained therapist. Not only do they need to identify
and label the emotions of others, they also need to recognize their own. In
addition, they must work out what is behind those emotions and how they can use
that information to influence what happens next. This is called “tactical
empathy,” a technique that can be successfully applied in any negotiation.
To use tactical empathy as a tool in your own life, the most
important first step is to acclimatize your senses by being patient, saying
less, and observing more. Listen to what the other party is saying, watch their
body language, and observe their tone of voice. The beginning of any
negotiation should be primarily explorative, so use the radio voice, open
question, and mirroring techniques provided earlier to gather as much
information as possible. Keep going until you can label the emotion that they
are experiencing and any factors that are contributing to that emotion. By
assessing the bigger picture and truly understanding their position, you can
then begin to fathom how you can influence them with whatever it is you are
proposing.
Let’s say you are in the middle of a silly argument about the
dishes with your partner. It was your turn but you need to rush out. In a
calming tone you say: “Sorry, you say it was my turn to do the dishes?” As they
respond, observe their behavior and tone of voice, and try to label the emotion
they are feeling. In this case, you notice they are feeling underappreciated.
You apologize again and confirm your appreciation: “Sorry, you are right it was
my turn, but I would really appreciate your help today.”
Emotion is a powerful negotiation tool and using it to your
advantage doesn’t have to be a cold tactic. In fact, in exploring any concerns
the other party may have and by working toward a resolution together, they
should leave with more clarity and confidence in the agreement. This approach
will also help you to build a deeper and more meaningful relationship, which
often leads to greater results for all parties.
Don’t just get people to say “yes”—you want them
to say “that’s right”
The word “yes” has historically been considered the ultimate goal
of any negotiation—but not anymore. What you actually need to hear is “that’s
right,” because this means you not only have agreement, you also have an understanding.
Getting someone to say these two words is about leading them toward their own
subtle epiphany, a moment when they recognize their own emotion and feel
released from any concerns. So, what does it take to get to those two magic
words?
Having tried and tested the techniques revealed so far in
isolation, the FBI’s elite Crisis Negotiation Unit (CNU) have since developed a
five-stage crisis negotiation model: the Behavioral Change Stairway Model
(BCSM). That is to actively listen and use tactical
empathy to build rapport and influence the
other party in a way that leads to behavioral change.
While the BCSM model was developed by the CNU, the core principles
can be traced back to findings from American psychologist Carl Rogers. He
recognized that forcing your own values on a client to establish the “correct”
course of action is not effective, and that, instead, therapists should accept
people for who they are and treat them with “unconditional positive regard.”
This approach can be very effective if you truly want to influence
the behavior of others, whether they are your business partner, colleague,
relative, or friend. Think about it. When someone tells you that you shouldn’t
eat this, or smoke that, and that exercise is good for you, will you change for
the sake of doing what is right? Probably not. Conversely, if someone was to
truly listen to the reason you do those things and help you address the cause
of your behavior, you might just begin to realize that a different course of
action is necessary.
If you really make an effort to listen to what they are saying and
connect with the emotion they are feeling, then you can help to navigate them
toward a resolution and influence real change. They will come to an
understanding in their epiphany that what you are proposing will facilitate the
“right” outcome for their needs, as well as yours.
Learn to read the unspoken needs of the other
party during negotiation, and address their “irrational blind spots”
preemptively
The human mind is complex and often unpredictable, especially
during negotiation. There are always a number of hidden needs and “irrational
blind spots” that need to be addressed. Rather than treating a negotiation as a
linear process, you need to be mindful that there is always leverage and a
number of variables at hand.
In addition to listening and using the open question and mirroring
techniques, which enable you to build rapport and trust, you also need to
become less naive and more confident about what you can get out of the situation.
Too often we default to a “let’s split the difference” mentality, trying to
appease everyone involved—but this is not the best approach. If your partner
disagreed with the color of your shoes, and you agreed to wear one in each
color, this would not be a good result. Compromise is a bad deal: no deal at
all is better than one that doesn’t deliver what you actually need.
Instead of splitting the difference, there are some neat tricks
that can help you use recently discovered information to change the other
party’s perception of the negotiation, causing them to abandon previous
expectations and see the deal in the same light that you do. This includes
using odd, unrounded numbers when discussing figures in order to signal your
knowledge of the potential transaction, tapping into their need for fairness,
and taking advantage of a fear of deadlines.
To help you visualize how this could work in practice, let’s look
at the last one—a fear of deadlines. You are in a business meeting, and you
discover that time is an issue: deadline pressures are causing your counterpart
to feel anxious. Instead of falling into the trap of rushing into a compromise,
address the deadline. What could you do to reassure them about the timeframe?
You must get to the bottom of what is causing the anxiety and reassure them
through your resolution. Equally, you can use the deadline pressure to your
advantage: if they need this done quickly, then do they really have time to
continue negotiations? Acknowledge that time is an issue, but that you are
confident you can not only get it done in time, but get it done right.
During a negotiation, many people fail to articulate everything
they are worried or feel anxious about. It is your job to expose these hidden
needs and “irrational blind spots” so that you can address them immediately and
reassure the other party. Don’t resort to splitting the difference or
compromising; instead change their perception of the deal so that it is
compatible with yours by preemptively resolving their problems. The secret to
being a successful negotiator is a highly developed sense of perception.
Final summary
Negotiation is actually a very emotional process. A good
negotiator knows how to listen and collect all the information they need before
they attempt to close a deal. This is why the first step to improving your own
negotiation skills is to change your perspective on what negotiating actually
means.
It helps to view each negotiation as a discovery exercise,
approaching each scenario with curiosity and an open mind. You can also use
open questions and mirroring techniques to create “forced empathy,” which
encourages the other party to reconsider what they are asking and rethink their way
toward a resolution that works for both parties. This enables
you to get the result you want, but also allows them to feel in control.
Adjustments to your tone of voice, using the word “sorry,” and
mirroring the other party’s words and body language can help you to build
rapport and create a shared space for thinking and speaking together. The FBI’s
BCSM five-step strategy can also help you to get beyond a “yes” to real buy in
and, ultimately, the two best words for a successful negotiation: “that’s
right.”
Remember, a good negotiator should always expect surprises and enter a negotiation with an open mind. They should be ready to listen and act based on what they’ve learned or discovered during negotiations to address any issues the other party may have, even if these issues haven’t been expressed yet. If you can combine all of these techniques with strategic empathy tactics and address their unspoken needs, then you will have your negotiation counterpart in the palm of your hands.
Never
Split the Difference by Chris Voss
Print
| Hardcover | Audiobook
Never
Split the Difference Summary
Sam’s
Notes
Chris
Voss is a former international FBI hostage negotiator. In his book, Never Split
the Difference, Chris reveals his battle-tested strategies for high-stakes
negotiations.
The
Five Big Ideas
Negotiation
begins with listening, making it about the other people, validating their
emotions, and creating enough trust and safety for a real conversation to
begin.
Use
mirrors to encourage the other side to empathize and bond with you, keep people
talking, buy your side time to regroup, and encourage your counterparts to reveal
their strategy.
Tactical
empathy brings our attention to both the emotional obstacles and the potential
pathways to getting an agreement done.
Giving
someone’s emotion a name, otherwise known as labeling, gets you close to
someone without asking about external factors you know nothing about.
“No”
provides a great opportunity for you and the other party to clarify what you
really want by eliminating what you don’t want.
Never
Split the Difference Summary
Chapter
1: The New Rules
Negotiation
begins with the universally applicable premise that people want to be
understood and accepted. Listening is the cheapest, yet most effective
concession we can make to get there. By listening intensely, you demonstrate
empathy and show a sincere desire to better understand what the other side is
experiencing.
Chapter
2: Be a Mirror
Good
negotiators know that they need to be ready for surprises; great negotiators
use their skills to reveal the surprises they are certain to exist.
Great
negotiators question the assumptions that others accept on faith or in
arrogance. Thus, they remain more emotionally open to all possibilities and
more intellectually agile to a fluid situation.
People
who view negotiation as a battle of arguments become overwhelmed by the voices
in their head. Negotiation is not an act of battle; it’s a process of
discovery. Your goal is to uncover as much information as possible.
To
quiet the voices in your head, make your sole and all-encompassing focus the
other person and what they have to say.
Your
goal is to identify what your counterpart actually needs and get them feeling
safe enough to talk about what they want.
Negotiation
begins with listening, making it about the other people, validating their
emotions, and creating enough trust and safety for a real conversation to
begin.
Going
too fast is one of the mistakes all negotiators make. If you’re too much in a
hurry, people can feel as if they’re not being heard and you risk undermining
the rapport and trust we’ve built.
There
are three voice tones available to negotiators:
The
late-night FM DJ voice: Use selectively to make a point. Inflect your voice
downward, keeping it calm and slow. When done properly, you create an aura of
authority and trustworthiness without triggering defensiveness.
The positive/playful
voice: Should be your default voice. It’s the voice of an easygoing,
good-natured person. Your attitude is light and encouraging. The key here is to
relax and smile while you’re talking.
The
direct or assertive voice: Used rarely. Will cause problems and create
pushback.
Put
a smile on your face. When people are in a positive frame of mind, they think
more quickly and are more likely to collaborate and problem-solve. Positivity
creates mental agility in both you and your counterpart.
You
can be very direct and to the point as long as you create safety by a tone of
voice that says “I’m okay, you’re okay, let’s figure things out.”
View
assumptions as hypotheses and use the negotiation to test them rigorously.
Mirrors
work magic. Repeat the last three words (or the critical one to three words) of
what someone has just said. We fear what’s different and are drawn to what’s
similar. Mirroring is the art of insinuating similarity, which facilitates
bonding. Use mirrors to encourage the other side to empathize and bond with
you, keep people talking, buy your side time to regroup, and encourage your
counterparts to reveal their strategy.
By
repeating back what people say, your counterpart will inevitably elaborate on
what was just said and sustain the process of connecting.
In
one study by Richard Wiseman, the average tip of the waiters who mirrored was
70 percent more than of those who used positive reinforcement.
Having
the right mindset is the key to a successful negotiation.
To
get your own way without confrontation, follow five simple steps:
Use
the late-night FM DJ voice;
Start
with “I’m sorry …”;
Mirror;
Silence.
At least four seconds, to let the mirror work its magic on your counterpart;
and
Repeat.
Chapter
3: Don’t Feel Their Pain, Label It
Tactical
empathy is understanding the feelings and mindset of another in the moment and
also hearing what is behind those feelings so you increase your influence in
all the moments that follow. It’s bringing our attention to both the emotional
obstacles and the potential pathways to getting an agreement done.
When
we closely observe a person’s face, gestures, and tone of voice, our brain
begins to align with theirs in a process called neural resonance, and that lets
us know more fully what they think and feel.
If
you want to increase your neural resonance skills, take a moment right now and
practice. Turn your attention to someone who’s talking near you, or watch a
person being interviewed on TV. As they talk, imagine that you are that person.
Visualize yourself in the position they describe and put in as much detail as
you can as if you were actually there.
Labeling
is a way of validating someone’s emotion by acknowledging it. Give someone’s
emotion a name and you show you identify with how that person feels. It gets
you close to someone without asking about external factors you know nothing
about.
The
first step to labeling is detecting the other person’s emotional state.
The
trick to spotting feelings is to pay close attention to changes people undergo
when they respond to external events. Most often, those events are your words.
Once
you’ve spotted an emotion you want to highlight, the next step is to label it
aloud. Labels can be phrased as statements or questions. The only difference is
whether you end the sentence with a downward or upward inflection. But no
matter how they end, labels almost always begin with roughly the same words:
“It
seems like …”
“It
sounds like …”
“It
looks like …”
When
responding, your counterpart will usually give a longer answer than just “yes”
or “no.” And if they disagree with the label, that’s okay. You can always step
back and say, “I didn’t say that was what it was. I just said it seems like
that.”
The
last rule of labeling is silence. Once you’ve thrown out a label, be quiet and
listen.
In
basic terms, people’s emotions have two levels: the “presenting” behavior is
the part above the surface you can see and hear; beneath, the “underlying”
feeling is what motivates the behavior.
What
good negotiators do when labeling is address those underlying emotions.
Labeling negatives diffuses them (or defuses them, in extreme cases); labeling
positives reinforces them.
Labeling
helps de-escalate angry confrontations because it makes the person acknowledge
their feelings rather than continuing to act out.
The
fastest and most efficient means of establishing a quick working relationship
is to acknowledge the negative and diffuse it.
Research
shows that the best way to deal with negativity is to observe it, without
reaction and without judgment. Then consciously label each negative feeling and
replace it with positive, compassionate, and solution-based thoughts.
Imagine
yourself in your counterpart’s situation. When you acknowledge the other
person’s situation, you immediately convey that you are listening. And once
they know that you are listening, they may tell you something that you can use.
The
reasons why a counterpart will not make an agreement with you are often more
powerful than why they will make a deal, so focus first on clearing the
barriers to agreement. Denying barriers or negative influences gives them
credence; get them into the open.
Pause.
After you label a barrier or mirror a statement, let it sink in. Don’t worry,
the other party will fill the silence.
Label
your counterpart’s fears to diffuse their power.
List
the worst things that the other party could say about you and say them before
the other person can. Because these accusations often sound exaggerated when
said aloud, speaking them will encourage the other person to claim that quite
the opposite is true.
Remember
you’re dealing with a person who wants to be appreciated and understood. So use
labels to reinforce and encourage positive perceptions and dynamics.
Chapter
4: Beware “Yes”—Master “No”
Pushing
hard for “Yes” doesn’t get a negotiator any closer to a win; it just angers the
other side.
For
good negotiators, “No” provides a great opportunity for you and the other party
to clarify what you really want by eliminating what you don’t want.
“No”
is the start of the negotiation, not the end of it.
Great
negotiators seek “No” because they know that’s often when the real negotiation
begins.
“No”
can often mean:
I am
not yet ready to agree;
You
are making me feel uncomfortable;
I do
not understand;
I
don’t think I can afford it;
I
want something else;
I
need more information; or
I
want to talk it over with someone else.
Ask
solution-based questions: “What about this doesn’t work for you?” “What would
you need to make it work?” “It seems like there’s something here that bothers
you.”
People
have a need to say, “No.” So don’t just hope to hear it at some point; get them
to say it early.
There
are three kinds of “Yes”:
Counterfeit;
Confirmation;
and
Commitment.
A
counterfeit “yes” is one in which your counterpart plans on saying “no” but
either feels “yes” is an easier escape route or just wants to keep the
conversation going to get more information or some other kind of edge.
A
confirmation “yes” is generally innocent, a reflexive response to a black-or-white
question; it’s sometimes used to lay a trap but mostly it’s just simple
affirmation with no promise of action.
A
commitment “yes” is the real deal; it’s a true agreement that leads to action,
a “yes” at the table that ends with a signature on the contract. The commitment
“yes” is what you want, but the three types sound almost the same so you have
to learn how to recognize which one is being used.
Whether
you call it “buy-in” or “engagement” or something else, good negotiators know
that their job is to gently guide their counterpart to discover their goal as
his own.
Using
all your skills to create rapport, agreement, and connection with a counterpart
is useful, but ultimately that connection is useless unless the other person
feels that they are equally as responsible, if not solely responsible, for
creating the connection and the new ideas they have.
Though
the intensity may differ from person to person, you can be sure that everyone
you meet is driven by two primal urges: the need to feel safe and secure, and
the need to feel in control. If you satisfy those drives, you’re in the door.
If
you’re trying to sell something, don’t start with “Do you have a few minutes to
talk?” Instead ask, “Is now a bad time to talk?” Either you get “Yes, it is a
bad time” followed by a good time or a request to go away, or you get “No, it’s
not” and total focus.
As
you can see, “No” has a lot of skills:
“No”
allows the real issues to be brought forth;
“No”
protects people from making—and lets them correct—ineffective decisions;
“No”
slows things down so that people can freely embrace their decisions and the
agreements they enter into;
“No”
helps people feel safe, secure, emotionally comfortable, and in control of
their decisions; and
“No”
moves everyone’s efforts forward.
Another
way to force “No” in a negotiation is to ask the other party what they don’t
want.
If
despite all your efforts, the other party won’t say “No,” you’re dealing with
people who are indecisive or confused or who have a hidden agenda.
Saying
“No” makes the speaker feel safe, secure, and in control, so trigger it. That’s
why “Is now a bad time to talk?” is always better than “Do you have a few
minutes to talk?”
Sometimes
the only way to get your counterpart to listen and engage with you is by
forcing them into a “No.” That means intentionally mislabeling one of their
emotions or desires or asking a ridiculous question—like, “It seems like you
want this project to fail”—that can only be answered negatively.
If a
potential business partner is ignoring you, contact them with a clear and
concise “No”-oriented question that suggests that you are ready to walk away.
“Have you given up on this project?” works wonders.
Chapter
5: Trigger The Two Words That Immediately Transform Any Negotiation
Before
you convince your counterpart to see what you’re trying to accomplish, you have
to say the things to them that will get them to say, “That’s right.”
“That’s
right” is better than “yes.” Strive for it. Reaching “that’s right” in a
negotiation creates breakthroughs.
Use
a summary to trigger a “that’s right.” The building blocks of a good summary
are a label combined with paraphrasing. Identify, rearticulate, and emotionally
affirm “the world according to …”
Chapter
6: Bend Their Reality
The
most powerful word in negotiations is “Fair.”
As a
negotiator, you should strive for a reputation of being fair. Your reputation
precedes you. Let it precede you in a way that paves success.
Know
the emotional drivers and you can frame the benefits of any deal in language
that will resonate.
To
get real leverage in a tough negotiation, you have to persuade the other party
that they have something to lose if the deal falls through.
Here’s
how:
1.
Anchor Their Emotions
To
bend your counterpart’s reality, you have to start with the basics of empathy.
Start out with an accusation audit acknowledging all of their fears. By
anchoring their emotions in preparation for a loss, you inflame the other
side’s loss aversion so that they’ll jump at the chance to avoid it.
2.
Let The Other Guy Go First … Most of The Time
Going
first is not necessarily the best thing when it comes to negotiating price.
Let
the other side anchor monetary negotiations.
By
letting them anchor you also might get lucky: Chris has experienced many
negotiations when the other party’s first offer was higher than the closing
figure he had in mind. If he’d gone first they would have agreed and he would
have left with either the winner’s curse or buyer’s remorse, those
gut-wrenching feelings that he’d overpaid or undersold.
You’ve
got to be careful when you let the other party anchor. You have to prepare
yourself psychically to withstand the first offer. If the other guy’s a pro, a
shark, he’s going to go for an extreme anchor in order to bend your reality.
3.
Establish a Range
When
confronted with naming your terms or price, counter by recalling a similar deal
which establishes your “ballpark,” albeit the best possible ballpark you wish
to be in. Instead of saying, “I’m worth $110,000,” say, “At top places like X
Corp., people in this job get between $130,000 and $170,000.” That gets your
point across without moving the other party into a defensive position. And it
gets him thinking at higher levels.
4.
Pivot to Non-Monetary Terms
One
of the easiest ways to bend your counterpart’s reality to your point of view is
to pivot to non-monetary terms.
After
you’ve anchored them high, you can make your offer seem reasonable by offering
things that aren’t important to you but could be important to them. Or if their
offer is low you could ask for things that matter more to you than them.
5.
When You Do Talk Numbers, Use Odd Ones
Numbers
that end in 0 inevitably feel like temporary placeholders, guesstimates that
you can easily be negotiated off of. But anything you throw out that sounds
less rounded—say, $37,263—feels like a figure that you came to as a result of a
thoughtful calculation.
6.
Surprise with a Gift
You
can get your counterpart into a mood of generosity by staking an extreme anchor
and then, after their inevitable first rejection, offering them a wholly
unrelated surprise gift.
How
to Negotiate a Better Salary
i.
Be Pleasantly Persistent on Non-Salary Terms
Pleasant
persistence is a kind of emotional anchoring that creates empathy with the boss
and builds the right psychological environment for constructive discussion.
The
more you talk about non-salary terms, the more likely you are to hear the full
range of their options. For example, asking for extra vacation.
ii.
Salary Terms without Success Terms is Russian Roulette
Once
you’ve negotiated a salary, make sure to define success for your position—as
well as metrics for your next raise.
iii.
Spark Their Interest in Your Success and Gain an Unofficial Mentor
When
you are selling yourself to a manager, sell yourself as more than a body for a
job; sell yourself, and your success, as a way they can validate their own
intelligence and broadcast it to the rest of the company.
Make
sure they know you’ll act as a flesh-and-blood argument for their importance.
Once you’ve bent their reality to include you as their ambassador, they’ll have
a stake in your success.
Ask:
“What does it take to be successful here?”
Don’t
compromise. Meeting halfway often leads to bad deals for both sides.
Approaching
deadlines entice people to rush the negotiating process and do impulsive things
that are against their best interests.
The
F-word—“Fair”—is an emotional term people usually exploit to put the other side
on the defensive and gain concessions. When your counterpart drops the F-bomb,
don’t get suckered into a concession. Instead, ask them to explain how you’re
mistreating them.
You
can bend your counterpart’s reality by anchoring his starting point. Before you
make an offer, emotionally anchor them by saying how bad it will be. When you
get to numbers, set an extreme anchor to make your “real” offer seem
reasonable, or use a range to seem less aggressive.
People
will take more risks to avoid a loss than to realize a gain. Make sure your
counterpart sees that there is something to lose by inaction.
Chapter
7: Create the Illusion of Control
When
you go into a store, instead of telling the salesclerk what you “need,” you can
describe what you’re looking for and ask for suggestions. Then, once you’ve
picked out what you want, instead of hitting them with a hard offer, you can
just say the price is a bit more than you budgeted and ask for help with one of
the greatest-of-all-time calibrated questions: “How am I supposed to do that?”
Calibrated
questions have the power to educate your counterpart on what the problem is
rather than causing conflict by telling them what the problem is.
You
should use calibrated questions early and often, and there are a few that you
will find that you will use at the beginning of nearly every negotiation. “What
is the biggest challenge you face?” is one of those questions.
Here
are some other great standbys that Chris uses in almost every negotiation,
depending on the situation:
What
about this is important to you?
How
can I help to make this better for us?
How
would you like me to proceed?
What
is it that brought us into this situation?
How
can we solve this problem?
What’s
the objective? / What are we trying to accomplish here?
How
am I supposed to do that?
Calibrated
questions make your counterpart feel like they’re in charge, but it’s really
you who are framing the conversation.
Even
with all the best techniques and strategy, you need to regulate your emotions
if you want to have any hope of coming out on top.
The
first and most basic rule of keeping your emotional cool is to bite your
tongue.
Another
simple rule is, when you are verbally assaulted, is to disarm your counterpart
by asking a calibrated question.
When
people feel that they are not in control, they adopt what psychologists call a
hostage mentality. That is, in moments of conflict they react to their lack of
power by either becoming extremely defensive or lashing out.
Avoid
questions that can be answered with “Yes” or tiny pieces of information. These
require little thought and inspire the human need for reciprocity; you will be
expected to give something back.
Ask
calibrated questions that start with the words “How” or “What.” By implicitly
asking the other party for help, these questions will give your counterpart an
illusion of control and will inspire them to speak at length, revealing
important information.
Don’t
ask questions that start with “Why” unless you want your counterpart to defend
a goal that serves you. “Why” is always an accusation, in any language.
Calibrate
your questions to point your counterpart toward solving your problem. This will
encourage them to expend their energy on devising a solution.
There
is always a team on the other side. If you are not influencing those behind the
table, you are vulnerable.
Chapter
8: Guarantee Execution
Negotiators
have to be “decision architects.” They have to dynamically and adaptively
design the verbal and nonverbal elements of the negotiation to gain both
consent and execution.
“Yes”
is nothing without “How.”
With
enough of the right “How” questions, you can read and shape the negotiating
environment in such a way that you’ll eventually get to the answer you want to
hear.
The
trick to “How” questions is that they are gentle and graceful ways to say “No”
and guide your counterpart to develop a better solution—your solution. A gentle
How/No invites collaboration and leaves your counterpart with a feeling of
having been treated with respect.
Besides
saying “No,” the other key benefit of asking “How?” is that it forces your
counterpart to consider and explain how a deal will be implemented.
By
making your counterparts articulate implementation in their own words, your
carefully calibrated “How” questions will convince them that the final solution
is their idea. And that’s crucial. People always make more effort to implement
a solution when they think it’s theirs.
There
are two key questions you can ask to push your counterparts to think they are
defining success their way: “How will we know we’re on track?” and “How will we
address things if we find we’re off track?” When they answer, you summarize
their answers until you get a “That’s right.” Then you’ll know they’ve bought
in.
Be
wary of two telling signs that your counterpart doesn’t believe the idea is
theirs. When they say, “You’re right,” it’s often a good indicator they are not
vested in what is being discussed.
When
you push for implementation and they say, “I’ll try,” be aware: it really
means, “I plan to fail.”
When
you hear either of the above, dive back in with calibrated “How” questions
until they define the terms of successful implementation in their own voice.
Follow
up by summarizing what they have said to get a “That’s right.”
You
have to beware of “behind the table” or “Level II” players—that is, parties
that are not directly involved but who can help implement agreements they like
and block ones they don’t.
Below
are tactics, tools, and methods for using subtle verbal and nonverbal forms of
communication to understand and modify the mental states of your counterpart.
i.
The 7-38-55 Percent Rule
Albert
Mehrabian created the 7-38-55 rule. That is, only 7 percent of a message is
based on the words while 38 percent comes from the tone of voice and 55 percent
from the speaker’s body language and face.
Pay
very close attention to tone and body language to make sure they match up with
the literal meaning of the words. If they don’t align, it’s quite possible that
the speaker is lying or at least unconvinced.
When
someone’s tone of voice or body language does not align with the meaning of the
words they say, use labels to discover the source of the incongruence.
Recognizing
the incongruence and gently dealing with it through a label will make the other
party feel respected. Consequently, your relationship of trust will be
improved.
ii.
The Rule of Three
The
Rule of Three is simply getting the other guy to agree to the same thing three
times in the same conversation.
The
first time they agree to something or give you a commitment, that’s No. 1. For
No. 2 you might label or summarize what they said so they answer, “That’s
right.” And No. 3 could be a calibrated “How” or “What” question about
implementation that asks them to explain what will constitute success,
something like “What do we do if we get off track?”
The
three times might also just be the same calibrated question phrased three
different ways, like “What’s the biggest challenge you faced? What are we up
against here? What do you see as being the most difficult thing to get around?”
iii.
The Pinocchio Effect
In a
study of the components of lying, Harvard Business School professor Deepak
Malhotra and his coauthors found that, on average, liars use more words than
truth tellers and use far more third-person pronouns. They start talking about
him, her, it, one, they, and their rather than I, in order to put some distance
between themselves and the lie. Moreover, they discovered that liars tend to
speak in more complex sentences in an attempt to win over their suspicious
counterparts.
The
researchers dubbed this the Pinocchio Effect because, just like Pinocchio’s
nose, the number of words grew along with the lie.
The
more in love your counterpart is with “I,” “me,” and “my” the less important
they are. Conversely, the harder it is to get a first-person pronoun out of a
negotiator’s mouth, the more important they are.
iv.
The Chris Discount
People
are often tired of being hammered with their own name. So, take a different
tack and use your own name.
Doing
so creates the dynamic of “forced empathy.” It makes the other side see you as
a person.
How
to Get Your Counterparts to Bid Against Themselves
The
best way to get your counterparts to lower their demands is to say “No” using
“How” questions. These indirect ways of saying “No” won’t shut down your
counterpart the way a blunt, pride-piercing “No” would.
Chris
has found that you can usually express “No” four times before actually saying
the word.
The
first step in the “No” series is the old standby: “How am I supposed to do
that?” You have to deliver it in a deferential way, so it becomes a request for
help. Properly delivered, it invites the other side to participate in your
dilemma and solve it with a better offer.
After
that, some version of “Your offer is very generous, I’m sorry, that just
doesn’t work for me” is an elegant second way to say “No.”
This
well-tested response avoids making a counteroffer, and the use of “generous”
nurtures your counterpart to live up to the word. The “I’m sorry” also softens
the “No” and builds empathy.
Then
you can use something like “I’m sorry but I’m afraid I just can’t do that.”
It’s a little more direct, and the “can’t do that” does great double duty. By
expressing an inability to perform, it can trigger the other side’s empathy
toward you. “I’m sorry, no” is a slightly more succinct version for the fourth
“No.” If delivered gently, it barely sounds negative at all.
If
you have to go further, of course, “No” is the last and most direct way.
Verbally, it should be delivered with a downward inflection and a tone of
regard; it’s not meant to be “NO!”
Is
the “Yes” real or counterfeit? Test it with the Rule of Three: use calibrated
questions, summaries, and labels to get your counterpart to reaffirm their
agreement at least three times. It’s really hard to repeatedly lie or fake
conviction.
A
person’s use of pronouns offers deep insights into his or her relative
authority. If you’re hearing a lot of “I,” “me,” and “my,” the real power to
decide probably lies elsewhere. Picking up a lot of “we,” “they,” and “them,”
it’s more likely you’re dealing directly with a savvy decision maker keeping
his options open.
Chapter
9: Bargain Hard
When
you feel you’re being dragged into a haggle, you can detour the conversation to
the non-monetary issues that make any final price work. You can do this
directly by saying, in an encouraging tone of voice, “Let’s put price off to
the side for a moment and talk about what would make this a good deal.” Or you
could go at it more obliquely by asking, “What else would you be able to offer
to make that a good price for me?” And if the other side pushes you to go
first, wriggle from his grip. Instead of naming a price, allude to an
incredibly high number that someone else might charge.
When
a negotiation is far from resolution and going nowhere fast, you need to shake
things up and get your counterpart out of their rigid mindset.
When
you want to flip a dubious counterpart to your side, ask them, “Why would you
do that?” but in a way that the “that” favors you.
If
you are working to lure a client away from a competitor, you might say, “Why
would you ever do business with me? Why would you ever change from your
existing supplier? They’re great!” In these questions, the “Why?” coaxes your
counterpart into working for you.
Using
the first-person singular pronoun is another great way to set a boundary
without escalating into confrontation. When you say, “I’m sorry, that doesn’t
work for me,” the word “I” strategically focuses your counterpart’s attention
onto you long enough for you to make a point.
When
you want to counteract unproductive statements from your counterpart, you can
say, “I feel ___ when you ___ because ___,” and that demands a time-out from
the other person.
Once
you’re clear on what your bottom line is, you have to be willing to walk away.
Never be needy for a deal.
The
person across the table is never the problem. The unsolved issue is.
The
Ackerman Model
The
Ackerman model is an offer-counteroffer method. But it is an effective system
for beating the usual lackluster bargaining dynamic, which has the predictable
result of meeting in the middle.
The
systematized and easy-to-remember process has only six steps:
Set
your target price (your goal);
Set
your first offer at 65 percent of your target price;
Calculate
three raises of decreasing increments (to 85, 95, and 100 percent);
Use
lots of empathy and different ways of saying “No” to get the other side to
counter before you increase your offer;
When
calculating the final amount, use precise, non-round numbers like, say, $37,893
rather than $38,000. It gives the number credibility and weight; and
On
your final number, throw in a non-monetary item (that they probably don’t want)
to show you’re at your limit.
Identify
your counterpart’s negotiating style. Once you know whether they are
Accommodator, Assertive, or Analyst, you’ll know the correct way to approach
them.
Prepare
an Ackerman plan. Before you head into the weeds of bargaining, you’ll need a
plan including extreme anchors, calibrated questions, and well-defined offers.
Remember: 65, 85, 95, 100 percent. Decreasing raises and ending on non-round
numbers will get your counterpart to believe that he’s squeezing you for all
you’re worth when you’re really getting to the number you want.
Chapter
10: Find The Black Swan
Every
case is new. We must let what we know—our known knowns—guide us but not blind
us to what we do not know.
As a
negotiator, you should always be aware of which side, at any given moment,
feels they have the most to lose if negotiations collapse.
To
get leverage, persuade your counterpart that they have something real to lose
if the deal falls through.
At a
taxonomic level, there are three kinds of leverage: Positive, Negative, and
Normative.
Positive
leverage is quite simply your ability as a negotiator to provide—or
withhold—things that your counterpart wants. When they say that, you have
power.
Negative
leverage is what most civilians picture when they hear the word “leverage.”
It’s a negotiator’s ability to make his counterpart suffer.
Normative
leverage is using the other party’s norms and standards to advance your
position. If you can show inconsistencies between their beliefs and their
actions, you have normative leverage.
Discovering
the Black Swans that give you normative valuation can be as easy as asking what
your counterpart believes and listening openly. You want to see what language
they speak and speak it back to them.
In
their book Negotiation Genius, Harvard Business School professors Deepak
Malhotra and Max H. Bazerman provide a look at the common reasons negotiators
mistakenly call their counterparts crazy.
Mistake
#1: They Are Ill-Informed
People
operating with incomplete information appear crazy to those who have different
information.
Your
job, when faced with someone like this in a negotiation, is to discover what
they do not know and supply that information.
Mistake
#2: They Are Constrained
In
any negotiation where your counterpart is acting wobbly, there exists a
distinct possibility that they have things they can’t do but aren’t eager to
reveal.
Mistake
#3: They Have Other Interests
These
people are simply complying with needs and desires that you don’t yet
understand, what the world looks like to them based on their own set of rules.
The
Best Techniques for Flushing Out Black Swans—and Exploiting Them.
Let
what you know—your known knowns—guide you but not blind you. Every case is new,
so remain flexible and adaptable.
Black
Swans are leverage multipliers. Remember the three types of leverage: positive
(the ability to give someone what they want); negative (the ability to hurt
someone); and normative (using your counterpart’s norms to bring them around).
Work
to understand the other side’s “religion.” Digging into worldviews inherently
implies moving beyond the negotiating table and into the life, emotional and
otherwise, of your counterpart. That’s where Black Swans live.
Exploit
the similarity principle. People are more apt to concede to someone they share
a cultural similarity with, so dig for what makes them tick and show that you
share common ground.
Recommended
Reading
If
you like Never Split the Difference, you may also enjoy the following books:
How
to Win Friends & Influence People by Dale Carnegie
Start
with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action by Simon Sinek
To
Sell Is Human: The Surprising Truth About Moving Others by Dan H. Pink
Finding
something important and meaningful in your life is the most productive use of
your time and energy. This is true because every life has problems associated
with it and finding meaning in your life will help you sustain the effort
needed to overcome the particular problems you face. Thus, we can say that the
key to living a good life is not giving a fuck about more things, but rather,
giving a fuck only about the things that align with your personal values.
The Subtle Art Of Not Giving A F*ck does away with the positive psychology craze to instead give you a Stoic, no bullshit approach to living a life that might not always be happy, but meaningful and centered only around what’s important to you.
Lesson 1: Only hold values you control.
Mark(the
author) is a very stoic guy and it shines through his writing and
advice. A common idea in Stoicism is to focus only on the things you can
control. This is easy enough to understand and implement when it comes to your
actions, but it can be applied to more intangible aspects of your life as well.
Take
your values, for example. I know it’s hard to put them into words, but if you
try to describe yourself in, say, three adjectives, you already have a good
idea of which values most dictate your life. Let’s say you chose the words
honest, punctual and popular. Here’s where Mark makes an interesting
remark: Only choose to have values you can control.
Most
of us give up some of our ideals as we grow up, try to have a career and make
money. While that’s just part of real life, it’s important you don’t hand off
the steering wheel altogether. Values you don’t control are bad, because
they’ll be a constant source of unnecessary suffering in your life.
When
we look at the three we just mentioned, honesty is 100% in your control. Only
you know how honest you are, but no one else needs to. Punctuality is partially
in your control. If you always leave with plenty of buffer time, you can
compensate for most potential obstacles. Popularity, however, is totally out of
your grasp. Sure, you can be nice and friendly to everyone, but you can’t
control other peoples’ opinions. Some will always hate you, no matter what
you do.
Therefore,
popularity isn’t the best value to focus on and you could try replacing it with
one more controllable, such as kindness.
Lesson 2: Certainty hampers growth.
What
a great principle distilled into just three words: certainty hampers growth.
Imagine you could choose between two modes of moving through the world: one in
which you think everything you know is 100% true and one in which you think
nothing you know is 100% true. Both are stressful, but which one do you think
would help you make better decisions?
The
latter, of course. While there’s some middle ground to be found here, rejecting
the idea that you know anything for sure is a great base to start learning from.
This is true for discovering factual knowledge, such as using the
scientific method to build business hypotheses helps arrive at better
conclusions, but it is also true for gaining conceptual knowledge.
The
second kind is more implicit knowledge about the relationships between various
entities. Let’s take your place in the social hierarchy at school, for example.
If you’re convinced you’re ugly, you’ll be sad a lot. But if you notice that
you get lots of compliments at school, people call you charming and some have a
crush on you, that’s evidence your brain is playing you with false certainty.
If
you allow yourself to have a little doubt, you can then disprove this limiting
belief you hold about yourself.
Lesson 3: Don’t obsess about leaving a legacy.
Here’s
an uncomfortable, but important reminder: You’re going to die one day. We all
are. Whether we admit it or not, when the time comes closer, we’re all scared.
That’s why many of us want to leave a legacy, myself included. However,
Mark says that might ruin our short amount of precious time here on earth.
The more we’re driven to build a great body of work, the more start chasing fame, working too much and focusing on the future. What if instead, we just tried to be useful in the present? We could still help a ton of people, enjoy our days and fully be here, while we’re here.
Mark’s
stance is clear: Find ways to bring yourself, your loved ones and the people
you meet joy in the now and let the legacy part take care of itself.
For
as much as I love positive psychology, sometimes it just doesn’t work, even for
me. There’s another mode that might sound odd, but still works: toiling. You
know how you have the occasional week where it’s literally just grinding? Even if
you usually like your job, nothing exciting happens for a few days, you have a
lot of deadlines and you just toil away to get it done.
It’s
the mode I’m in right now and weirdly, it’s still kinda satisfying. Probably,
because it feels liberating not to have to ooze happy vibes all the time.
Blogging demigod Mark Manson has coined a better phrase for this mode of
operation: The Subtle Art Of Not Giving A F*ck. His first “proper” book, this
instant New York Times bestseller is a no BS self-help book for people who
usually hate self-help.
Mark
gets that life has become overwhelming and the only way to find our center
around the things that really matter to us is to not give a f*ck about anything
else.
Here
are my 3 favorite lessons:
Values you can’t control are bad values to follow.
Don’tbelieve you know anything with certainty, for it keeps you from improving.
Tryingto leave a legacy might ruin your life.
The
trick of not giving a fuck about most things is that you’ll be able to give one
about what really matters to you. Let’s see how we can get a bit closer to
that!
Lesson
1: Only hold values you control.
Mark
is a very Stoic guy and it shines through his writing and advice. A common idea
in Stoicism is to focus only on the things you can control. This is easy enough
to understand and implement when it comes to your actions, but it can be
applied to more intangible aspects of your life as well.
Take
your values, for example. I know it’s hard to put them into words, but if you
try to describe yourself in, say, three adjectives, you already have a good
idea of which values most dictate your life. Let’s say you chose the words
honest, punctual and popular. Here’s where Mark makes an interesting remark:
Only choose to have values you can control.
Most
of us give up some of our ideals as we grow up, try to have a career and make
money. While that’s just part of real life, it’s important you don’t hand off
the steering wheel altogether. Values you don’t control are bad, because
they’ll be a constant source of unnecessary suffering in your life.
When
we look at the three we just mentioned, honesty is 100% in your control. Only
you know how honest you are, but no one else needs to. Punctuality is partially
in your control. If you always leave with plenty of buffer time, you can
compensate for most potential obstacles. Popularity, however, is totally out of
your grasp. Sure, you can be nice and friendly to everyone, but you can’t
control other peoples’ opinions. Some will always hate you, no matter what you
do.
Therefore,
popularity isn’t the best value to focus on and you could try replacing it with
one more controllable, such as kindness.
Lesson
2: Certainty hampers growth.
What
a great principle distilled into just three words: certainty hampers growth.
Imagine you could choose between two modes of moving through the world: one in
which you think everything you know is 100% true and one in which you think
nothing you know is 100% true. Both are stressful, but which one do you think
would help you make better decisions?
The
latter, of course. While there’s some middle ground to be found here, rejecting
the idea that you know anything for sure is a great base to start learning
from. This is true for discovering factual knowledge, such as using the scientific
method to build business hypotheses helps arrive at better conclusions, but it
is also true for gaining conceptual knowledge.
The
second kind is more implicit knowledge about the relationships between various
entities. Let’s take your place in the social hierarchy at school, for example.
If you’re convinced you’re ugly, you’ll be sad a lot. But if you notice that
you get lots of compliments at school, people call you charming and some have a
crush on you, that’s evidence your brain is playing you with false certainty.
If
you allow yourself to have a little doubt, you can then disprove this limiting
belief you hold about yourself.
Lesson
3: Don’t obsess about leaving a legacy.
Here’s
an uncomfortable, but important reminder: You’re going to die one day. We all
are. Whether we admit it or not, when the time comes closer, we’re all scared.
That’s why many of us want to leave a legacy, myself included. However, Mark
says that might ruin our short amount of precious time here on earth.
The
more we’re driven to build a great body of work, the more start chasing fame,
working too much and focusing on the future. What if instead, we just tried to
be useful in the present? We could still help a ton of people, enjoy our days
and fully be here, while we’re here.
Mark’s
stance is clear: Find ways to bring yourself, your loved ones and the people
you meet joy in the now and let the legacy part take care of itself.
My
personal take-aways
Mark’s
writing is funny and to the point. No bullshit, lots of curse words, but lots
of insight too. It’s a medium long book with just over 200 pages, but light in
terms of how fast you get through, because Mark uses many examples too. I
already learned another lesson from the first chapter: success has nothing to
do with self-improvement. You can read that chapter as a free preview on
Scribd.
The
Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck is a book that challenges the conventions of
self-help by inviting the reader to NOT try, say no often and embrace negative
thinking.
Not
giving a f*ck is about being comfortable with being different and caring about
something more important than adversity.
You
must give a f*ck about something.
The
Five Big Ideas
Conventional
self-help advice focuses on what you’re NOT. Further, it zeros in on what you
perceive your personal shortcomings and failures to already be, and highlights
them for you.
The
key to a good life is not giving a f*ck about more; it’s giving a fuck about
less, giving a fuck about only what is true and immediate and important.
When
you feel angry about feeling angry or anxious about feeling anxious, you’re
stuck in what Manson calls, “The Feedback Loop from Hell.”
However,
by not giving a f*ck that you feel bad, you short-circuit the Feedback Loop
from Hell; you say to yourself, “I feel like s*it, but who gives a f*ck?”
Because
there’s an infinite amount of things we can now see or know, there is also an
infinite number of ways we can discover that we don’t measure up, that we’re
not good enough, that things aren’t as great as they could be. And this rips us
apart inside.
What
Not Giving a F*ck Means
Subtlety
#1: Not giving a f*ck does not mean being indifferent; it means being
comfortable with being different.
A
sneaky truth about life. There’s no such thing as not giving a f*ck. You must
give a f*ck about something.
You
can’t be an important and life-changing presence for some people without also
being a joke and an embarrassment to others.
Subtlety
#2: To not give a f*ck about adversity, you must first give a f*ck about
something more important than adversity.
If
you find yourself consistently giving too many f*cks about trivial s*it that
bothers you, chances are you don’t have much going on in your life to give a
legitimate f*ck about.
Subtlety
#3: Whether you realize it or not, you are always choosing what to give a f*ck
about.
Maturity
is what happens when one learns to only give a f*ck about what’s truly
f*ckworthy.
The
idea of not giving a f*ck is a simple way of reorienting our expectations for
life and choosing what is important and what is not.
The
Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck Summary
The
desire for more positive experience is itself a negative experience. And,
paradoxically, the acceptance of one’s negative experience is itself a positive
experience.
The
more you pursue feeling better all the time, the less satisfied you become, as
pursuing something only reinforces the fact that you lack it in the first
place. Philosopher Alan Watts used to refer to as “The Backwards Law” (further
reading: the hedonic treadmill).
Everything
worthwhile in life is won through surmounting the associated negative
experience.
To
not give a f*ck is to stare down life’s most terrifying and difficult
challenges and still take action.
When
you give too many f*cks—when you give a f*ck about everyone and everything—you
will feel that you’re perpetually entitled to be comfortable and happy at all
times, that everything is supposed to be just exactly the f*cking way you want
it to be.
Pain
and loss are inevitable and we should let go of trying to resist them.
The
greatest truths in life are usually the most unpleasant to hear.
We
suffer for the simple reason that suffering is biologically useful. It is
nature’s preferred agent for inspiring change.
Don’t
hope for a life without problems. There’s no such thing. Instead, hope for a
life full of good problems.
Problems
never stop; they merely get exchanged and/or upgraded.
Happiness
comes from problems you enjoy having and solving.
Nobody
who is actually happy has to stand in front of a mirror and tell himself that
he’s happy.
Emotions
are simply biological signals designed to nudge you in the direction of
beneficial change.
Negative
emotions are a call to action. When you feel them, it’s because you’re supposed
to do something. (Tony Robbins discusses this in detail in Awaken the Giant
Within.)
Just
because something feels good doesn’t mean it is good.
Everything
comes with an inherent sacrifice—whatever makes us feel good will also
inevitably make us feel bad.
A
more interesting question, a question that most people never consider, is,
“What pain do you want in your life? What are you willing to struggle for?”
Because that seems to be a greater determinant of how our lives turn out.
What
determines your success isn’t, “What do you want to enjoy?” The relevant
question is, “What pain do you want to sustain?” The path to happiness is a
path full of s*itheaps and shame.
Who
you are is defined by what you’re willing to struggle for.
Our
struggles determine our successes.
Our
problems birth our happiness, along with slightly better, slightly upgraded
problems.
The
problem with the self-esteem movement is that it measured self-esteem by how
positively people felt about themselves. But a true and accurate measurement of
one’s self-worth is how people feel about the negative aspects of themselves.
People
who feel entitled view every occurrence in their life as either an affirmation
of or a threat to, their own greatness.
The
true measurement of self-worth is not how a person feels about her positive
experiences, but rather how she feels about her negative experiences.
A
person who actually has a high self-worth is able to look at the negative parts
of his character frankly—“Yes, sometimes I’m irresponsible with money,” “Yes,
sometimes I exaggerate my own successes,” “Yes, I rely too much on others to
support me and should be more self-reliant”—and then acts to improve upon them.
A
lot of people are afraid to accept mediocrity because they believe that if they
accept it, they’ll never achieve anything, never improve and that their life
won’t matter.
The
rare people who do become truly exceptional at something do so not because they
believe they’re exceptional. On the contrary, they become amazing because
they’re obsessed with improvement. And that obsession with improvement stems
from an unerring belief that they are, in fact, not that great at all.
If
suffering is inevitable, if our problems in life are unavoidable, then the
question we should be asking is not “How do I stop suffering?” but “Why am I
suffering—for what purpose?”
Self-awareness
is like an onion. The first layer is a simple understanding of one’s emotions.
The second layer is an ability to ask why we feel certain emotions. This layer
of questioning helps us understand the root cause of the emotions that
overwhelm us. Once we understand that root cause, we can ideally do something
to change it. The third level is our personal values: Why do I consider this to
be success/failure? How am I choosing to measure myself? By what standard am I
judging myself and everyone around me?
Values
underlie everything we are and do. If what we value is unhelpful, if what we
consider success/failure is poorly chosen, then everything based upon those
values—the thoughts, the emotions, the day-to-day feelings—will all be out of
whack.
Much
of the advice out there operates at a shallow level of simply trying to make
people feel good in the short term, while the real long-term problems never get
solved.
Take
a moment and think of something that’s really bugging you. Now ask yourself why
it bugs you. Chances are the answer will involve a failure of some sort.
What
is objectively true about your situation is not as important as how you come to
see the situation, how you choose to measure it and value it.
Our
values determine the metrics by which we measure ourselves and everyone else.
If
you want to change how you see your problems, you have to change what you value
and/or how you measure failure/success.
Pleasure
is not the cause of happiness; rather, it is the effect.
Research
shows that once one is able to provide for basic physical needs (food, shelter,
and so on), the correlation between happiness and worldly success quickly
approaches zero.
Constant
positivity is a form of avoidance, not a valid solution to life’s
problems—problems which, by the way, if you’re choosing the right values and
metrics, should be invigorating you and motivating you.
When
we force ourselves to stay positive at all times, we deny the existence of our
life’s problems. And when we deny our problems, we rob ourselves of the chance
to solve them and generate happiness.
Problems
add a sense of meaning and importance to our lives.
Some
of the greatest moments of one’s life are not pleasant, not successful, not
known, and not positive.
Good
values are 1) reality-based, 2) socially constructive, and 3) immediate and
controllable. Bad values are 1) superstitious, 2) socially destructive, and 3)
not immediate or controllable.
When
we have poor values—that is, poor standards we set for ourselves and others—we
are essentially giving f*cks about the things that don’t matter, things that in
fact make our life worse.
Often
the only difference between a problem being painful or being powerful is a
sense that we chose it, and that we are responsible for it.
If
you’re miserable in your current situation, chances are it’s because you feel
like some part of it is outside your control—that there’s a problem you have no
ability to solve, a problem that was somehow thrust upon you without your
choosing.
We
don’t always control what happens to us. But we always control how we interpret
what happens to us, as well as how we respond. (Ryan Holiday writes at length
about perspective in The Obstacle Is the Way.)
The
more we choose to accept responsibility for our lives, the more power we will
exercise over our lives. (“Take 100% Responsibility for Your Life” is Principle
#1 in The Success Principles by Jack Canfield.)
Accepting
responsibility for our problems is thus the first step to solving them.
A
lot of people hesitate to take responsibility for their problems because they believe
that to be responsible for your problems is to also be at fault for your
problems.
The
responsibility/fault fallacy allows people to pass off the responsibility for
solving their problems to others.
Our
beliefs are malleable, and our memories are horribly unreliable.
The
more something threatens your identity, the more you will avoid it. Manson
calls this, “The Law of Avoidance”
When
we let go of the stories we tell about ourselves, to ourselves, we free
ourselves up to actually act (and fail) and grow.
There
is little that is unique or special about your problems. That’s why letting go
is so liberating.
The
narrower and rarer the identity you choose for yourself, the more everything
will seem to threaten you. For that reason, define yourself in the simplest and
most ordinary ways possible.
Questions
that will help you breed more uncertainty in your life.
What
if I’m wrong?
What
would it mean if I were wrong?
Would
being wrong create a better or a worse problem than my current problem, for
both myself and others?
It’s
worth remembering that for any change to happen in your life, you must be wrong
about something.
Being
able to look at and evaluate different values without necessarily adopting them
is perhaps the central skill required in changing one’s own life in a
meaningful way.
Manson
tries to live with few rules, but one that he’s adopted over the years is this:
if it’s down to him being screwed up, or everybody else being screwed up, it is
far, far, far more likely that he’s the one who’s screwed up.
If
it feels like it’s you versus the world, chances are it’s really just you
versus yourself.
Improvement
at anything is based on thousands of tiny failures, and the magnitude of your
success is based on how many times you’ve failed at something. If someone is
better than you at something, then it’s likely because she has failed at it
more than you have. If someone is worse than you, it’s likely because he hasn’t
been through all of the painful learning experiences you have.
We
can be truly successful only at something we’re willing to fail at. If we’re
unwilling to fail, then we’re unwilling to succeed.
Life
is about not knowing and then doing something anyway.
Action
isn’t just the effect of motivation; it’s also the cause of it.
If
you lack the motivation to make an important change in your life, do
something—anything, really—and then harness the reaction to that action as a
way to begin motivating yourself.
When
the standard of success becomes merely acting—when any result is regarded as
progress and important, when inspiration is seen as a reward rather than a
prerequisite—we propel ourselves ahead. We feel free to fail, and that failure
moves us forward.
Ultimately,
the only way to achieve meaning and a sense of importance in one’s life is
through a rejection of alternatives, a narrowing of freedom, a choice of
commitment to one place, one belief, or (gulp) one person.
We
all must give a f*ck about something, in order to value something. And to value
something, we must reject what is not that something.
The
desire to avoid rejection at all costs, to avoid confrontation and conflict,
the desire to attempt to accept everything equally and to make everything
cohere and harmonize, is a deep and subtle form of entitlement.
The
difference between a healthy and an unhealthy relationship comes down to two
things: 1) how well each person in the relationship accepts responsibility, and
2) the willingness of each person to both reject and be rejected by their
partner.
The
mark of an unhealthy relationship is two people who try to solve each other’s
problems in order to feel good about themselves. Rather, a healthy relationship
is when two people solve their own problems in order to feel good about each
other.
Entitled
people who blame others for their own emotions and actions do so because they
believe that if they constantly paint themselves as victims, eventually someone
will come along and save them, and they will receive the love they’ve always
wanted. Entitled people who take the blame for other people’s emotions and
actions do so because they believe that if they “fix” their partner and save
him or her, they will receive the love and appreciation they’ve always wanted.
It
can be difficult for people to recognize the difference between doing something
out of obligation and doing it voluntarily. So here’s a litmus test: ask
yourself, “If I refused, how would the relationship change?” Similarly, ask,
“If my partner refused something I wanted, how would the relationship change?”
It’s
not about giving a f*ck about everything your partner gives a f*ck about; it’s
about giving a f*ck about your partner regardless of the f*cks he or she gives.
Conflict
exists to show us who is there for us unconditionally and who is just there for
the benefits.
For
a relationship to be healthy, both people must be willing and able to both say
no and hear no.
When
trust is destroyed, it can be rebuilt only if the following two steps happen:
1) the trust-breaker admits the true values that caused the breach and owns up
to them, and 2) the trust-breaker builds a solid track record of improved
behavior over time.
Death
is the light by which the shadow of all of life’s meaning is measured.
Confronting
the reality of our own mortality is important because it obliterates all the
crappy, fragile, superficial values in life.
You
are going to die, and that’s because you were fortunate enough to have lived.
If
you like The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck, you may also enjoy the following
books:
How
to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie
Love
Yourself Like Your Life Depends On It by Kamal Ravikant
Everyone has a truth that they need to live and share. For the author, that truth was committing to the daily practice of repeating the phrase “I love myself.” When you love yourself, life loves you back.
Read the full book summary »
Love
Yourself Like Your Life Depends On It by Kamal Ravikant
Print
| Kindle | Audiobook
Love
Yourself Like Your Life Depends On It Summary
The
Book in Three Sentences
It
there’s one lesson Kamal can share from his experience it’s to share your
truth.
When
you share your truth, the world responds in ways you could never have imagined.
Kamal’s
truth is to love himself like his life depends on it.
The
Five Big Ideas
In
simplicity lies truth. In simplicity lies power.
Loving
yourself is a practice and requires commitment.
It
doesn’t matter if you don’t like or love yourself in the beginning—what matters
is you focus on one thought repeatedly until it becomes top of mind.
“The
Practice”: (1) Mental loop (2) A meditation (3) One question
The
most important relationship we’ll ever have is with ourselves.
Love
Yourself Like Your Life Depends On It Summary
James
Altucher on writing: “I don’t do a post now unless I’m worried about what
people will think about me.” (Sam: James discusses this further in Choose
Yourself.)
In
simplicity lies truth. In simplicity lies power.
Loving
yourself is a practice.
Kamal
was in a bad way. He was miserable out of his mind and there were days where he
would lay in bed, too depressed to even open the drapes. One day he hit his
“emotional threshold” (an idea Anthony Robbins discusses in Awaken the Giant
Within), got out of bed and wrote himself the following:
This
day, I vow to myself to love myself, to treat myself as someone I love truly
and deeply—in my thoughts, my actions, the choices I make, the experiences I
have, each moment I am conscious, I make the decision I LOVE MYSELF.
Kamel
didn’t know how to love myself. All he knew was that he’d made a vow—something
far greater than a commitment, bigger than an I-wish or a nice-to-have. A vow.
Kamal
didn’t believe he loved himself in the beginning. What mattered more, though,
was he was committing to the practice and in the simplest way, he could think
of: focusing on one thought repeatedly until it was more top of mind.
“Imagine
the feeling of catching yourself loving yourself without trying. It’s like
catching a sunset out of the corner of your eye. It will stop you.”
The
Practice
Mental
loop
A
meditation
One question
It
doesn’t matter if you don’t love or even like yourself—it’s okay to build up to
it.
“Darkness
is the absence of light. If you remember
this, it will change your life.”
“Any
negative thought is darkness.”
“Imagine
you’re in a dark room and it’s bright outside. Your job is to go to the window,
pull out a rag, and start cleaning. Just clean. sAnd soon enough, light enters
naturally, taking the darkness away. It’s that simple. Each time the mind
shifts to darkness—fear, worry, pain, you name it—when you notice, clean the
window. Light will flow in.”
1.
Mental Loop
Often,
we’re running familiar patterns and loops in our head. When we replay these
loops, they trigger feelings. It’s automatic to the point where we believe we
don’t have a choice. But we do.
Kamal
compares a thought loop to a groove in a rock created by water: “If you had a
thought once, it has no power over you.
Repeat it again and again, especially with emotional intensity, feeling
it, and over time, you’re creating the grooves, the mental river. Then it controls you.”
“Take
this one thought, I love myself. Add emotional intensity if you can —it deepens
the groove faster than anything. Feel the thought. Run it again and again. Feel
it. Run it. Whether you believe it or
not doesn’t matter, just focus on this one thought. Make it your truth.”
2. A
Meditation
Kamal
meditates for seven minutes every day.
In
his own works,
I
sit with my back against a wall, put on my headphones, listen to the music, and
imagine galaxies and stars and the Universe above, and I imagine all the light
from space flowing into my head and down into my body, going wherever it needs
to go. I breathe slowly, naturally. As I
inhale, I think, I love myself. Then I exhale and let out whatever the response
in my mind and body is, whether there is one or not. That’s it. Simple.
How
to Meditate
Step
1. Put on music. Something soothing, gentle, preferably instrumental. A piece
you have positive associations with.
Step
2. Sit with back against wall or window. Cross legs or stretch them out,
whatever feels natural.
Step
3. Close eyes. Smile slowly. Imagine a beam of light pouring into your head
from above.
Step
4. Breathe in, say to yourself in your mind, I love myself. Slowly. Be gentle with yourself.
Step
5. Breathe out and along with it, anything that arises. Any thoughts, emotions,
feelings, memories, fears, hopes, desires. Or nothing. Breathe it out. No
judgment, no attachment to anything. Be
kind to yourself.
Step
6. Repeat 4 and 5 until the music ends. (When your attention wanders, notice it
and smile. Smile at it as if it’s a child doing what a child does. And with
that smile, return to your breath. Step 4, Step 5. Mind wanders, notice, smile kindly, return to
Step 4, Step 5.
Step
7. When music ends, open your eyes slowly. Smile. Do it from the inside out.
This is your time. This is purely yours.
3.
One Question
On
dealing with others and reacting to their negative emotions with his own: “If I
loved myself truly and deeply, would I let myself experience this?”
The
answer to the above is always no.
Rather
than solving the emotion or trying not to feel it, Kamal will just return to
the one true thing in his head, “I love myself, I love myself, I love myself.”
“Here
we are, thinking that one needs to be in love with another to shine, to feel
free and shout from the rooftops, but the most important person, the most
important relationship we’ll ever have is waiting, is craving to be loved truly
and deeply.”
“Beautiful
irony. Fall in love with yourself. Let your love express itself and the world
will beat a path to your door to fall in love with you.”
Another
Meditation
Step
1. Set a timer for 5 minutes.
Step
2. Stand in front of a mirror, nose a few inches away. Relax. Breathe.
Step
3. Look into your eyes. Helps if you focus on one. Your left eye. Don’t panic,
it’s only you. Relax. Breathe slowly, naturally, until you develop
a rhythm.
Step
4. Looking into your left eye, say, “I love myself.” Whether you believe it
that moment or not isn’t important. What’s important is you saying it to
yourself, looking into your eyes, where there is no escape from the truth. And
ultimately, the truth is loving yourself.
Step
5. Repeat “I love myself” gently, pausing occasionally to watch your eyes. When
the five minutes are up, smile. You’ve just communicated the truth to yourself
in a deep, visceral way. In a way, the mind cannot escape. If anyone ever
looked in your eyes, knowing that you loved them, this is what they saw. Give
yourself the same gift.
When
life goes well for a while it’s easy to believe it’ll stay that way (it won’t).
And when you believe that, you become complacent. Your practice becomes
something you assume rather than something you work on. You stop truly loving
yourself. Kamal calls this “coasting”.
If
you begin to coast, ask yourself, “If I loved myself, truly and deeply, what
would I do?”
“The
goal, if there is one, is to practice until the thought you chose becomes the
primary loop. Until it becomes the filter through which you view life.”
“Real
growth comes through intense, difficult, and challenging situations.”
“What
we believe, that’s what we seek, it’s the filter we view our lives through.”
Recommended
Reading
If
you like Love Yourself Like Your Life Depends On It, you may also enjoy the
following books:
Awaken
The Giant Within: How to Take Immediate Control of Your Mental, Emotional,
Physical and Financial Destiny by Anthony Robbins
Feeling
Good: The New Mood Therapy by David D. Burns
The
Success Principles: How to Get From Where You Are to Where You Want to Be by
Jack Canfield